The UKAT website also provides an overview of the public laws which regulate the use of AT and provides specific information about each law. I have included the overview and the specific section of the 1990 IDEA act that requires consideration and use of AT if needed for the student to perform a given task.
Similar to the tools shown on my prior OTAP post, UKAT provides a link (below) with an AT implementation worksheet which addresses critical questions such as AT device recommended, cost of device, locations to purchase device, uses of device, training, locations in which device will be used, set up and maintenance of device, device repairs, and evaluation of the usefulness of the selected device.
http://edsrc.coe.uky.edu/www/ukatii/toolkit/AT_Implementation.pdf
Using an AT implementation plan ensures that AT implementation proceeds through a collaboratively developed process (Quality Indicator #1) in which training needs are clearly defined (Quality Indicator #2) and that a follow up procedure is in place (Quality Indicator #6). Follow up procedures will determine if assessment data has been used successfully to identify appropriate AT devices and that any necessary AT adjustments based on performance data are made (Dell, A., Newton, D. & Petroff, J., 2012).
http://edsrc.coe.uky.edu/www/ukatii/toolkit/index.html
Dell, A., Newton, D., & Petroff, J. (2012). Assistive technology in the classroom. Boston:
MA: Pearson.
No comments:
Post a Comment